दृष्टा मयेत्युपेक्षक एको दृष्टाऽहमित्युपरमत्यन्या।
सति संयोगेऽपि तयोः प्रयोजनं नास्ति सर्गस्य॥ ६६॥
Translation by Henry Thomas Colebrooke (1837): He desists, because he has seen her; she does so, because she has been seen. In their (mere) union there is no motive for creation. |
Translation by John Davies (1881): 'It has been seen by me', says the one, ceasing to regard; 'I have been seen', says the other, and ceases to act. In the (mere) conjunction of the two there is no motive for production. |
Translation by Ganganath Jha (1896): "She has been seen by me", says the one and so retires; "I have been seen", says the other, and ceases to act. Hence though there is still their conjunction, it affords no motive towards further creation. |
Translation by Nandalal Sinha (1915): "She has been seen by me", - so the one stands indifferent; "I have been seen", - so the other desists. Though their conjunction still remains, there does not exist any motive for creation. |
Translation by Har Dutt Sharma (1933): One (the Spirit) is indifferent like a spectator in play; one (the Nature) desists, (saying) that I have been seen. (Now), in spite of their contact, there is no motive for creation. |
Translation by Radhanath Phukan (1960): One (the witness) says, "I have seen her" (I understand what she is), and so understanding, becomes indifferent; the other saying "I have been seen", desists (from further prompting); thus although there is still conjunction between the two, there is no need for further creation (i.e., rebirth). |
Translation by Swami Virupakshananda (1995): The one (Puruṣa) thinks: 'she has been seen by me' and therefore, loses all interest; the other (Prakṛti) thinks 'I have been seen' and ceases to act further. Therefore, even if there is still connection there is no motive for further evolution. |
Translation by G. Srinivasan (recent): Observing the neutral state of one gives the proof that the observable movement of the other has ceased and even though both are together no interactive manifestation exists. |
No comments:
Post a Comment